Dear Jeyamohan,
I recently came across your book titled “Six Systems of Hindu Philosophy” at the book fair. While browsing through it, I noticed that none of the chapter titles mentioned Shaivism. This observation led me to wonder whether Hindu philosophy can truly exist without Shaivism. I discussed this question with my friends, but we were unable to reach a clear understanding. Therefore, I am writing to you directly to seek your insight. How should I interpret the focus of your book? Who is the intended audience?
Sincerely,
N. Manickavasagam
Dear Manickavasagam,
It has been 25 years since I wrote that book, and it has undergone several editions. The focus of the book is not on religious sects such as Shaivism or Vaishnavism; instead, it is primarily a philosophical work. It examines the six systems of philosophy within the Hindu intellectual tradition. In this context, there are both six religions and six distinct systems of philosophy, each with its own philosophical principles. The six systems represent clearly defined philosophical perspectives and are not religions themselves. These systems are Samkhya, Yoga, Nyaya, Vaisheshika, Purva Mimamsa, and Uttara Mimamsa.
These systems have been known and studied for a long time as the Shad Darshanas (Six Systems of Philosophy). Among them, Samkhya, Yoga, Nyaya, and Vaisheshika are initially atheistic. Over time, they were integrated into the theistic tradition, yet their foundational principles remain atheistic. Purva Mimamsa represents pure Vedic philosophy, while Uttara Mimamsa corresponds to what we refer to as Vedanta or Advaita. I authored that small book to serve as a guide for understanding these philosophical traditions.
The book is now available for readers. It provides an accessible overview of these philosophical systems for the ordinary reader. For those interested in exploring these concepts more deeply, I encourage you to join the Hindu spiritual training camps that we offer. You are warmly invited to participate.
Jeyamohan
