Dear Jayamohan,
I often reiterate the same points in my classes. Rationality is fundamentally a scientific perspective, grounded in clear evidence and the logic that supports it. If such evidence is absent, then it cannot be classified as science. Regardless of whether the evidence supports our viewpoint or that of the opposition, both hold equal weight.
Consequently, an individual who reacts with anger upon encountering opposing views is not a rationalist. Similarly, someone who criticizes or insults the opposition fails to embody rationality. A true rationalist speaks without attachment; irrespective of any affiliations—be it religion, race, language, or nationality—such attachments do not align with the principles of rationality.
The input text raises important points about rationality and the attitudes of certain groups. However, some sentences could be clarified for better understanding, and the tone could be made more consistent. Here’s a revised version:
In this context, it is the devotees of Periyar who claim to champion rationality, yet they often employ the rhetoric of religious zealots. They stand in direct opposition to a scientific mindset. A true rationalist approaches arguments with a commitment to scientific inquiry, grounded in truth. This commitment empowers them to question the beliefs of others. Such an environment encourages the free exchange and critical examination of ideas. In contrast, the inflexibility of dogmatic beliefs hinders progress and understanding, leading to divisions instead of fostering unity among diverse viewpoints.
When questioned about Periyar’s contribution to Vaikom, these devotees often react defensively and create elaborate narratives. For instance, if a rationalist asserts that Tamil is the oldest language in the world, they should seek evidence to support that claim. They should investigate whether the findings from Keezhadi have undergone rigorous scientific study. Similarly, if someone claims that iron was first discovered in Tamil Nadu, it is essential to request scientific evidence. Instead, these devotees tend to criticize those from northern regions and indulge in self-praise.
If there is one area where knowledge has notably diminished in Tamil Nadu, it is in the realm of rationality and a scientific attitude. This observation is profoundly significant.
Thanga. Gnanasekaram
